Perspectives · Process

The color the Founder likes and the color the brand needs

Personal color preference is a good starting point for a bedroom, not for the identity system.

Quick summary

Brand color serves strategy, not the aesthetic taste of the founder. The correct color filtering process begins with a competitor map. Then it is compared with the distribution channel and industry semantics. Finally, the color is placed into a system that can operate consistently. A color chosen based on rationale will have lasting value. A color chosen based on emotion can push the brand into a crowd you do not want to be part of.

In most identity projects Sinh Vũ has undertaken, the question of color arises very early. Often it is a specific color, sometimes accompanied by personal reasons. It could be a favorite color from school, the color of a foreign brand that the founder admires, or simply the feeling of "seeing and liking it." This is completely natural. The issue lies elsewhere: brand color does not serve the emotions of its creator. It serves the ability to be recognized and remembered by buyers.

Why color is an asset, not just aesthetics

Jenni Romaniuk at the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute defines distinctive brand assets by two metrics. The first is Fame, which refers to the level of widespread association in the minds of buyers. The second is Uniqueness, which refers to the degree of not being confused with other brands. Color, when chosen and maintained consistently, can become one of the strongest assets in the identity system. Because it operates before buyers read any words.

However, assets only accumulate when two conditions are met: the color is sufficiently prominent in the category and is repeated long enough and consistently. Colors chosen based on personal taste often violate the first condition. It may look very beautiful in a neutral space, but when placed in a competitive category, it can turn the brand into "one of them" instead of "the one."

Fame × UniquenessThis is the formula for measuring the strength of distinctive brand assets, including color. Source: Jenni Romaniuk, Building Distinctive Brand Assets, Oxford University Press, 2018.

Step one: draw the industry color map

Before choosing any color, Sinh Vũ performs a simple yet often overlooked task. Sinh Vũ gathers 8 to 12 brands within the same industry, price segment, and main distribution channel. Then, they arrange all of their identities on a piece of paper or a screen.

The outcome of this step often surprises the founder. Most industries have a "default color" that most players are using, sometimes due to historical reasons, sometimes due to copying each other over many rounds. The traditional finance sector leans towards navy blue and blue. Organic food often gets stuck in shades of green and earthy brown. The beauty segment for the mass market focuses on pink and clean white.

When the map appears, the new strategic question begins: do you want to stand out in that crowd or do you want buyers' eyes to stop at your brand first? Each choice has its own costs and benefits. Standing in the crowd brings familiarity to the category. Standing out brings higher recognition, but requires a sufficient communication budget for buyers to understand "who this is."

Being recognizable is more important than being different. However, being recognizable requires a distinctive asset that is prominent enough to be remembered.

Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow, Ehrenberg-Bass Institute, 2010

Step two: read the industry semantics and buyer expectations

Colors do not have universal meanings. "Red is energy, blue is trust" is an overly simplistic statement that often leads to incorrect decisions. The semantics of color depend on the industry context, geographical culture, and the set of brands surrounding it.

The right question is: in this industry, what are buyers learning from this color through the brands they already know? This is more important than what emotions this color evokes. If all premium brands in the skincare industry are using clean white and light yellow, a new brand using the same color tones will be understood as premium. This meaning has already been established. Conversely, if you choose a completely different tone, you need enough time and budget for buyers to relearn that new meaning.

This is why a color that the Founder loves may be perfectly suitable in one industry but sends entirely the wrong signal in another. It’s not that the color is bad; it’s just the context is wrong.

38%The higher price that buyers are willing to pay for a brand is perceived as "meaningful and different." Source: Kantar BrandZ, around 2020.

Step three: test colors through actual distribution channels

A color that looks good on a design screen does not guarantee it will perform well in actual distribution. This is a step many projects overlook because it requires meticulousness that is not exciting.

Each distribution channel has different requirements for color. Packaging on supermarket shelves needs shelf impact, meaning visibility from a distance under fluorescent lighting, competing directly with adjacent products. Thumbnails on e-commerce platforms display at a small size on a standard white background, requiring a very different contrast. Outdoor signage is exposed to direct sunlight, causing pastel or light neutral colors to nearly disappear. Mobile applications need to consider both dark and light modes.

Sinh Vũ tests each color in the shortlist by simulating it in the context of actual channels. The method is to print samples on real materials, place them in thumbnails next to competitors, and view them on actual phones under various lighting conditions. This step often eliminates a third of the candidate colors, as those colors do not perform well in the main channel, even though the color itself is not bad.

50 millisecondsThe time it takes to form the first visual impression, including color, before the viewer reads any information. Source: Lindgaard et al., Behaviour & Information Technology, 2006.

Step four: from candidate colors to an operational system

A correctly chosen primary color is still not enough. It needs to become a system: primary color, secondary colors, neutral colors, combination rules, standard color values for each print and digital environment. Without this system, even the most carefully chosen color will drift with each execution.

According to a survey by Marq and Demand Metric, brands that are consistent in communication and identity report significantly higher revenues compared to brands that execute asynchronously. That consistency starts from having colors defined accurately and adhered to, not from whether that color looks good in the eyes of the founder.

Transparent note: The figure "+23% revenue" from the Lucidpress/Marq and Demand Metric report (2016/2019) is the result of self-reported data from a business survey. This is not a controlled experimental study. Sinh Vũ cites this figure as a trend indicator, not a constant that can be applied to every case.

Color filtering is a business decision

When the color filtering process is thoroughly conducted, the Founder often realizes one of two things. Either the color they love truly has a strategic reason for use, or it does not. Both outcomes are far better than choosing a color and then looking for reasons to justify it afterward.

A color chosen based on rationale will become increasingly valuable over time, especially when repeated correctly across all touchpoints. A color chosen based on emotion can place the brand in the middle of a crowd where no one wants to be. Each subsequent color change is a waste of everything that has been built.

This is not a reason to disregard the Founder’s intuition. Personal aesthetic taste is a valuable input. It should be one of many signals in the process, not the sole signal determining the outcome.

References

Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow (Ehrenberg-Bass Institute, 2010). Jenni Romaniuk, Building Distinctive Brand Assets (Oxford UP, 2018). Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap (New Riders, 2003). Kantar BrandZ, Most Valuable Global Brands (Kantar, ~2020). Marq/Lucidpress & Demand Metric, Brand Consistency Report (2016/2019).

Frequently asked questions

Does color really affect brand identity?

Yes, but the reason is consistent repetition, not merely universal color psychology. According to Jenni Romaniuk (Ehrenberg-Bass), a distinctive brand asset, including color, only helps buyers remember the brand when it is sufficiently prominent. It also needs to be repeated long enough for buyers' brains to associate it with the brand. Randomly chosen colors or constantly changing them will never achieve this value.

How can I know if the color I choose overlaps with competitors?

The simplest way is to draw a color map: gather logos and primary color tones of 8 to 12 brands in the same industry and segment, then group them by color. The thick area is the area to avoid or requires a clearer differentiation strategy. Sinh Vũ performs this step in the research phase before committing to any palette.

I have used this color for many years, should I change it?

The answer depends on the level of brand equity accumulated, not on whether that color is beautiful or not. If the current buyer recognizes you through that color, a sudden color change is like burning brand equity. If that color has not created significant recognition, this is the right time to reassess its validity.

← Back to Perspectives