Domestic dietary supplements cannot win with benefit claims, because the market is saturated with that kind of language. The realistic way to compete is verifiable ingredient transparency and an identity system built on scientific grounds rather than emotion. This is not a trend. It is the minimum condition for customers to still pay attention.
In this article · 6 sections
Open any e-commerce page and look at the dietary supplement category.
You will see hundreds of boxes with the same language: “boosts immunity”, “supports liver and kidney”, “improves sleep”, “100% natural extract”. Not because the manufacturers lack creativity.
But it's the only language they know how to sell in.
The problem is that customers already know this.
The market is saturated with distrust
Decree 15/2018/NĐ-CP states clearly: dietary supplements must not claim to cure disease. But the legal gap between “supports” and “cures” has been thoroughly exploited for many years.
The result: Vietnamese consumers have learned to read packaging with skepticism. They look at the price, the image, the brand name, then decide.
They no longer read the benefit claims because every box says the same thing.
What does this number say about the dietary supplement sector? That there is still room to sell at a higher price.
But only when the brand creates a real difference in the buyer's mind, not on the ad.
Why benefit claims are no longer effective
Byron Sharp, in How Brands Grow, shows that ease of recognition matters more than differences in features.
Buyers do not compare ingredient details before putting a box in the basket. They recognize the brand, feel familiar, and buy.
That means the battle of benefit claims is the wrong battle. When everyone says “immune support”, no one stands out.
A brand that stops there becomes a commodity, and a commodity can only compete on price.
A brand is not what you say about your product. It is what buyers feel when they think of your name.
Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap
For supplements, what is that feeling today? For most domestic brands: no feeling at all. Invisible.
Ingredient transparency: the weapon left unused
Saying “extracted from nature” is something everyone says. Saying “Hưng Yên turmeric harvested in November, minimum 3% curcumin, batch tested” is something only you can say.
This is the difference between an emotional claim and verifiable evidence. With one, customers have to believe. With the other, customers can examine.
Ingredient transparency does not mean printing the entire technical file on the packaging.
It means choosing two or three pieces of information with real value, presenting them clearly, and keeping them consistent everywhere the brand appears.
- Specific ingredient origin: province, growing region, or farming standard.
- The content of the main active ingredient, not just its name.
- Independent testing body, if any, with the name of the body clearly stated.
- The storage process or production conditions, if they are what creates the quality.
Identity system: science, not emotion
Most domestic supplement brands are designed on feeling: green because green looks “healthy”, leaf shapes because they say “nature”, rounded fonts because they feel “friendly”.
The result is hundreds of boxes that look alike, because they all learned from the same visual language of the industry.
An identity system built on scientific evidence works differently.
It starts with these questions: who the buyer is, where they buy, in what context they see this product, and which identity assets (color, shape, typeface) can be owned in that category.
In those 50 milliseconds, customers do not read the benefit claims. They recognize an image. If that image does not create a distinctive signal, they keep scrolling.
In practical terms, this means:
- The color must be easy to recognize on a shelf or a product page, not just look good on its own.
- The typeface must stay legible at small sizes on a phone screen.
- The packaging layout must present transparent information without cluttering the eye.
- The whole system must stay consistent, from the product box to the order page to customer care messages.
Consistency: the condition for accumulation
Marty Neumeier writes that brands are built through repetition. Each time a customer sees the same identity signal, the impression gains another layer.
Supplements face one more challenge: a long purchase cycle. Customers buy one box, use it for one to three months, and only then decide whether to buy again.
During that time, if the brand is not consistently present across channels, they will forget it.
Consistency doesn't mean rigidity.
It means every touchpoint where customers meet the brand, from the product box to the social media post to the delivery slip, speaks the same language and conveys the same impression.
A realistic starting point
Sinh Vũ does not advise you to drop your entire communications budget and rebuild the brand from scratch. That is neither realistic nor necessary.
The starting point is to ask yourself: what is your brand saying right now that only you can say? If the answer is “nothing”, that is a diagnosis, not a verdict.
Domestic dietary supplements have an advantage that imported products find hard to copy: a supply chain at home that can be checked, Vietnamese ingredients with a real story, and a distance to consumers close enough to build trust directly.
The question is: do you have a system to tell that story consistently and credibly?
References
Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow (Ehrenberg-Bass Institute). Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap. Kantar BrandZ 2020: for brands seen as meaningful and different, customers pay 38% more. McKinsey, The Business Value of Design, 2018. Decree 15/2018/NĐ-CP on the management of functional foods in Vietnam. Euromonitor International: report on the Southeast Asian dietary supplement market.
