Expertise · Should we invest or not

Shooting real products or stock photos: making the right decision at the right time

Not every photo requires production costs, but there are some where using stock images is simply a loss.

Quick summary

Stock photos are reasonable for backgrounds, illustrating general concepts, or when time is tight and the budget is insufficient. What needs to be captured authentically are the actual products, real people, and the genuine space of the brand, as those are unique to you. The concise principle: capture real images for identification, use stock photos for supplementary parts.

Quick comparison
You should choose this direction when
  • Main images should feature the actual product you offer.
  • main sales touchpoint
  • needs to be different from competitors
  • Images of people and private spaces.
Not needed when.
  • background or general concept
  • tight deadlines with a limited budget
  • product does not have a final sample yet

This question is essentially about the importance of each image in the brand system. Not every image needs to be fully produced, but there are positions where using stock photos weakens your stance against competitors.

Understanding the role of each type of image correctly.

The brand photo set has two different layers. The first layer is the identification: real product photos, team portraits, workspace or store images. This is something only you have; no one can replace it. The second layer is the supporting part: decorative backgrounds, illustrations for articles, generic visual emojis. This part does not need to be unique.

The most common confusion is using stock photos for the first layer for convenience, then incurring costs without gaining any noticeable difference.

When is it mandatory to shoot real?

  • Product images, packaging, or distinctive materials: viewers want to see exactly what they are about to purchase.
  • Team portraits, founder images, and consultant staff: real faces build trust, unlike stock photos.
  • The physical space of the brand: store, workshop, office, if that is part of the reason customers choose you.
  • The main sales touchpoints: product pages, paid ads, export catalogs. This is where viewers are considering spending money; they scrutinize more than anywhere else.
  • When a brand needs to clearly differentiate itself from competitors in the same industry: a stock photo may be appearing on a competitor's website at the same time.

When stock photos are a reasonable choice

  • Background images or decorative textures that do not carry core information.
  • Illustration for blog posts or educational content, where ideas are more important than images.
  • The product or sample is not finished and is not ready for official photography.
  • The tight schedule and budget for this phase do not allow for full production.
Real photography: Higher production costs, but creates exclusive visual assets that no one else can replicate. Suitable for sales touchpoints, where viewers are evaluating the brand.

Stock photos: Low cost, quick deployment, but there is a risk of overlap with competitors and lack of identity. Suitable for supporting content, illustrating concepts, or less important positions in the customer journey.

Common mistakes when choosing stock images

  • Using stock photos of foreign models for a Vietnamese brand creates a sense of mismatch and lack of authenticity.
  • Mixing images from different stock sources, creating a patchwork set with no common visual language.
  • Realizing after purchasing stock images that they don't include your actual products, requiring a reshoot: costing you twice.
  • Do not skim the license: some stock photo packages do not allow use in paid advertising or have printing limitations.

Viewers scrutinize product images and real people. Generic model photos are often scrolled past, almost invisible to those with a specific goal.

Nielsen Norman Group, Photos as Web Content

The viewpoint of Sinh Vũ

Sinh Vũ sees a photo set as a system, not a collection of separate images. Before each photography project, the first task is to identify the identifying elements and the supporting elements within the overall photo library of the brand. The identifying elements will have a concept and shot list created and then produced. The supporting elements can temporarily use stock images while waiting or may not need additional production.

This perspective helps you avoid spending everything at once, while still ensuring the budget is focused on areas with the greatest impact, usually the product page and paid advertising first.

The tool brings back.

Decision checklist

Topic: When to shoot original photos instead of buying stock images. Sinh Vũ Guide, sinhvu.com

0 more than 7 items

Select each item you find appropriate, then print or save as PDF to take with you.

Sign indicating that you should take action
Questions to answer before deciding

If you have marked most of the signs above, this is the time to discuss in more detail. Sinh Vũ can help you review and propose a direction.

References

Nielsen Norman Group, Photos as Web Content. Sinh Vũ, service document R1 Brand photography (supplier source, not independent).

Frequently asked questions

Do stock photos violate copyright?

Stock photos are valid when you purchase the correct license package for specific usage. What you need to read carefully is whether the license allows use in paid advertising and if there are limits on the number of prints. Misusing a license constitutes a violation, while using it correctly poses no legal issues.

If there is no budget for a proper photoshoot, can we use temporary stock photos?

Yes, provided that stock images are not used at primary sales touchpoints like product pages or paid ads. It is acceptable to temporarily use stock images in illustrative articles or supporting content. When the budget allows, prioritize capturing real images in sales positions first.

← Back to Brand photography