The choice of logo style affects all subsequent touchpoints, so it is essential to choose correctly from the start.
For brands with low recognition, a wordmark or combination mark is safer than a symbol alone, as a standalone symbol cannot convey who you are when no one knows your name. The combination mark is the most flexible option: the text states the name, the symbol creates an impression, and later the symbol can be separated for use as an app icon. You should only go straight to a standalone symbol when the brand has recognition or has sufficient resources and time to build it.
The question about logo styles is often decided by personal preference, while it is a technical decision that should align with the brand stage, the name, and where the logo will be used. Sinh Vũ created this page to provide you with a framework to make the right choice, not to guess.
Before finalizing, you need to clearly understand the four common forms:
There is no absolutely perfect logo style. The right choice depends on the following factors:
Select a wordmark when: the brand name is short, easy to read, easy to remember, and you want customers to find you through that name. A wordmark is simple but does not mean weak, as long as the typography has its own character and does not use a standard font intact.
Choose a combined form when: you need to convey both the name and a visual mark, or when you anticipate needing a separate icon later. This is the most flexible option and suits most brands building from scratch.
Choose a simple symbol when: the brand already has high recognition, or has sufficient resources and time to build recognition for that symbol over many years. Without context, a symbol rarely conveys who you are.
Select lettermark when: the name is too long and the acronym is memorable enough and distinctive to stand alone.
Most businesses should start with a wordmark or combination mark, as a logo is just a symbol that heavily relies on brand recognition, which takes time to build.
Figma, VistaPrint
In the identity projects that Sinh Vũ undertakes, especially with software companies needing to stand alongside international competitors, a combined approach is often the natural destination: it requires the seriousness of typography along with a symbol compact enough to be used as an app icon.
Sinh Vũ delivers the logo along with all variants including horizontal, vertical, monochrome, and inverted. This means that no matter which direction you choose, the logo set is sufficient to be used correctly in each context without needing to improvise. The final decision always aligns with the brand personality established during the positioning phase, not starting from the question of "which style looks better."
If you have not gone through the orientation phase, the question "what type of logo to choose" will be very difficult to answer accurately, because the logo type must serve the brand personality, not the other way around.
Topic: Choosing a logo type: wordmark, symbol, or combination. Sinh Vũ guide, sinhvu.com
Select each item you find appropriate, then print or save as PDF to take with you.
If you have marked most of the signs above, this is the time to discuss in more detail. Sinh Vũ can help you review and propose a direction.
Figma: 12 Types of Logos; VistaPrint: 7 Types of Logos; Logo.fm: Wordmark vs Logomark vs Combination Mark; Sinh Vũ A1 service spec.
Long names are often difficult to turn into a neat logo. You have two options: shorten it to an acronym (lettermark) if the letters are memorable, or create a combination with the text presented cleverly. An abstract logo standing alone will not be recognized at this stage.
It is not necessary to have it from the start, but if your product has a mobile application or needs to be displayed in very small sizes, you should plan for the icon early on. A combined form addresses this: text for larger contexts, an icon for smaller contexts, and the two parts can be separated when needed.
Strong enough if the name is easy to read and the typography has a unique character, not using a standard font intact. Many major brands worldwide have used wordmarks for years before separating into distinct symbols. The only weakness is at very small sizes, where text is harder to read than an icon, so if that context is important, it needs to be considered.