7 minutes read

How much should a newly opened restaurant invest in identity?

Three budget levels, three different ambitions: the right allocation to avoid burning money before knowing where you will go.

Sinh Vũ · Creative DirectorF&B sector

Quick summary

The level of identity investment depends on your chain ambitions, not the shop's current size. A purely single-location shop needs an identity that is enough to operate, not a system. A shop aiming to open two to five branches needs a foundation that can be replicated. A shop that is truly aiming for a chain needs brand strategy before choosing tables and chairs.

In this article · 6 sections

In Vietnam's F&B sector, more than 50,000 outlets closed in the first half of 2025 alone. Most did not fail because the food was bad. They failed because they could not keep a reason for customers to come back. Brand identity is one of the tools that helps bring customers back, but invested at the wrong level or at the wrong time, it becomes nothing more than a sunk cost. The question to answer is how far to take the brand, and with what ambition.

Why chain ambitions determine the level of investment

A single-location café and a coffee brand aiming to open twenty branches may both be in their first month of operation. They may look similar on the surface. But what they need from brand identity is completely different.

A single location needs to be recognizable within a few hundred meters and create a trustworthy feeling for customers to enter for the first time. A chain needs a system that can be replicated across spaces, people, and operational costs without losing consistency. These are two completely different design challenges, and using the budget from one to solve the other is the most ineffective way to spend money.

Marty Neumeier defines a brand as what customers feel about it. That feeling forms in an instant. Lindgaard and colleagues measured that a visual impression forms in just 50 milliseconds. The problem is that customers of a single-location shop and customers of a twenty-location chain expect different signals within those 50 milliseconds.

50 millisecondsThe time it takes for the first visual impression to form in the viewer's perception. Source: Lindgaard et al., Behaviour & Information Technology, 2006.

Level one: a restaurant with one location, no expansion plan

If you open a shop to run one location well, focus on product quality and the experience on site, and have no plan to expand in the next five years, then the identity budget only needs to be enough to operate. No more than that.

Just enough here means a logo that reads clearly at many sizes. A color palette consistent enough that signage and packaging don't look out of step with each other. And a simple set of documents so the printer doesn't have to ask the designer every time. You don't need a thick brand guidelines book, motion identity, or brand architecture.

What should be avoided at this stage is investing in the depth of brand strategy when you yourself do not yet know who your true segment is after six months of operation. Many establishments create very elaborate positioning before opening, only to find that their real customers are completely different from their imagined ones. The entire identity budget must be redone from scratch.

Level two: targeting two to five branches

This is the group most likely to misallocate funds. They often open their first location with a basic identity budget, only to discover when opening the second location that the identity cannot be replicated. The signage at the new location looks different, the packaging printed elsewhere has color discrepancies, and new staff don’t know which font to use. The cost of redoing is always higher than getting it right from the start.

The shop should aim for two to five points where it invests in the system's foundation from the very first time. It doesn't have to be a complex system. But you need a brand identity with assets tested at multiple sizes and surfaces. You need a clearly defined color and type set, so you can hand it to a printer or a space contractor without having to stand over them. And you need at least one guideline document clear enough for someone without a design background to understand how to use it.

At this level, a strategic step is necessary, but it doesn't need to be too extensive. You need to know: who you are speaking to, in what tone, and what makes customers remember you rather than the competing establishment. Those three answers are enough to guide the design and maintain consistency when scaling.

85% / 30%85% of organizations have brand guidelines, but only about 30% implement them consistently in practice. Source: Marq (formerly Lucidpress), 2021 survey.
The data of 85%/30% comes from a self-reported survey by Marq, a brand document management platform. The results may be influenced by the biases of the surveyed subjects. However, the trend accurately reflects the real issue: having guiding documents does not mean those documents are being used.

Level three: targeting a real chain, from ten locations and above

If your ambition is truly to build a chain, the brand question must be solved before you sign the first lease. Not because identity matters more than the product. But because at chain scale, every operational decision carries brand costs that you won't see right away.

A chain needs a brand architecture, including name, positioning and identity system. That system must work consistently across many locations, many types of premises, many teams and many different print suppliers. This is no longer a problem of good-looking design, but a problem of an operating system.

Look at how the large F&B brands in Vietnam build their identities and this becomes clear. Highlands Coffee chose a "purely Vietnamese" angle as its positioning anchor from the start. Trung Nguyên uses the story of its Central Highlands origin as an asset that cannot be copied. These are not design decisions, but strategic decisions expressed through design.

A brand is not a logo. A brand is the perception in the hearts of customers about you.

Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap

The most common wasteful expenses

Regardless of the level, there are expenses that restaurant owners often incur too early and incorrectly.

  • Producing many logo options to choose from. This pushes the decision toward taste rather than strategy. The result usually reflects the preferences of the people in the room that day, not what the target customer actually finds relatable.
  • Invest in motion identity and digital systems when the café does not yet have a stable location or menu. These things can be done after the operational foundation is solid.
  • Copying a competitor's identity because it looks "modern". This is the fastest path into a price war. When customers can't tell you apart from your competitors, the only thing they compare is price.
  • Skipping real-world application. A logo that looks good on a computer screen but hasn't been tested on outdoor signage, on a paper cup under warm yellow light, or on small packaging. This is the most common shortfall.
38%The higher price that customers are willing to pay for a brand perceived as "meaningful and different". Source: Kantar BrandZ.

The right questions to self-position

Before signing any design contracts, there are three questions that need to be answered honestly.

One: in the next three years, how many locations do you see yourself operating? Not a dream number, but the number you are actually building a financial plan for.

Two: what is it about your shop that another shop right next door could not copy in six months? If the answer is only "ingredient quality" or "a beautiful space", you need to think further, because that is the answer of almost every shop.

Three: who exactly are your customers, not "anyone will do"? And what alternatives do they have right in your area?

Those three answers are not just for use in one brainstorming meeting. They are the foundation of every identity decision from here on. Doing identity work without these three answers is no different from building a house from the roof down.

References

Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow (Ehrenberg-Bass Institute). Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap. Nielsen, the failure rate of new CPG products. iPOS×Nestlé and the F&B industry data for Vietnam 2025. Ipsos, survey on the impact of packaging on purchase decisions (USA).

Frequently asked questions

Does a newly opened restaurant need to hire a professional brand design studio?

It depends on the ambition of the chain and the actual operational budget. If you plan to stop at one location, a basic identity set from a capable freelance designer is sufficient. If you aim for two or more locations within three years, investing in a foundational system from the start will be cheaper than redoing it later.

Why shouldn't you invest in premium identity right from the opening day?

"High-end identity requires a stable positioning strategy as a foundation, which is often only clear after the establishment has operated and knows who its real customers are. Creating identity before market feedback is betting on assumptions, not evidence. Many establishments create beautiful branding and then pivot their positioning, resulting in a complete erosion of their identity investment."

When should you rebrand instead of keeping the original identity?

When opening a second location or more, if the current identity cannot be replicated in form or cost, that is a signal to upgrade the system. Additionally, if the segment changes significantly, not just due to the owner's preferences, then rebranding is justified. Rebranding simply because you are tired of the old logo is the most costly and least effective reason.