When candidates come to you, you not only save on headhunter fees but also attract more proactive and suitable candidates.
Companies that build a clear employer brand attract active candidates instead of waiting for headhunters to approach. According to LinkedIn research, companies with strong employer brands pay significantly lower recruitment costs per position compared to the industry average. Their employee retention rates are also higher. This is a measurable business asset, not a communication cost.
Each time you pay a headhunter fee, you are paying for the absence of your employer brand (the way the labor market perceives your company as a place to work). It is not because the market lacks talented candidates, but because those candidates do not know you exist. Or they know but have no reason to actively reach out.
Headhunters charge a fee based on a percentage of the annual salary, typically ranging from 15% to 25% for mid-level management positions and can be higher for senior executive roles. For a department head position with a salary of 30 million VND per month, the search fee can range from 54 to 90 million VND for a single hire. This is the visible cost. The invisible cost is even greater. It includes the time management spends interviewing unsuitable candidates, the cost of vacant positions, and the cost of re-onboarding if the new hire leaves within the first year.
In other words: a weak employer brand not only costs you more to recruit. It also narrows the list of people willing to work with you from the start.
Talented candidates, especially those with stable jobs, do not browse job listings every day. They follow the companies they want to work for. They read the founder's posts on social media. They ask acquaintances in the industry. They evaluate your Recruitment page on your website before deciding whether to send a CV.
This is the mechanism that Byron Sharp refers to as Mental Availability: a brand exists in candidates' minds at the right moment when they are ready to change. If you do not build that presence continuously, you will be absent at the critical moment. And headhunters will present you as a second choice to candidates who have never heard of your company.
A brand is not found in a design file or identity system. A brand is the perception others have of you.
Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap
There is no one-size-fits-all number for every industry and every scale. But it can be calculated using the following framework.
Assuming the company hires an average of 10 positions each year, with an average salary of 25 million VND per month. If 6 out of 10 positions require a headhunter with a fee of 20% of the annual salary, the total fee is approximately 360 million VND each year. If the employer brand is strong enough to increase the rate of active candidates, the number of positions needing a headhunter could drop to 2 out of 10. In that case, the fee would decrease to 120 million VND. The difference of 240 million VND each year is what the employer brand can achieve. This figure does not account for the fact that active candidates often fit the culture better, have shorter onboarding times, and higher retention rates.
An employer brand is not just a beautiful recruitment page or a post about "happy workdays" on social media. Wally Olins once reminded us that a brand is behavior, not a statement: Product, Environment, Communication, Behavior. These four vectors apply entirely to the labor market.
The short answer: before you need to hire urgently. An employer brand does not yield results within a month. It operates on an accumulative mechanism, just like any other brand asset. You create awareness today, and reap active candidates after 6 to 12 months.
For businesses in a growth phase, this is a particularly valuable time to invest. Each wrong hire during a rapid team expansion not only incurs recruitment costs again. It can also slow down an entire project or disrupt the workflow of the entire team. Conversely, each person who actively seeks you out because they have been following and trusting your company tends to go further within the organization.
The starting point does not need to be large. A genuine company culture description, a purposefully designed recruitment process, and a consistent recruitment content strategy within six months. That alone can create a difference compared to most companies in the same sector in Vietnam. This is not a communication cost. This is an investment in the ability to attract talent, and it can be measured.
LinkedIn, Global Talent Trends (2016, 2022). LinkedIn Talent Solutions, The Ultimate List of Employer Brand Statistics (2018). SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management), Talent Acquisition Benchmarking Report (2022). Glassdoor, How to Respond to Reviews / Employer Branding Research (2020). Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap. Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow (Ehrenberg-Bass Institute).
Product brands focus on customers making purchases. Employer brands focus on the labor market: potential candidates, current employees, and those who have left. These two are interconnected. A company with a strong product brand but internal chaos will be exposed through reviews on job platforms, and vice versa. Building both consistently creates a self-supporting cycle.
Necessary, but on a different scale. Small companies actually have an advantage: clear leadership personality, easy-to-absorb culture. The issue is that they often do not proactively share that story externally. Just a genuine About Us page, a few posts about the actual working environment, and a designed recruitment process are enough to get ahead of most competitors of similar size.
The three most practical metrics: the ratio of active candidates applying compared to total candidates, the recruitment cost per position over time, and the acceptance rate of job offers when extended. If these three figures improve after you invest in recruitment communication and candidate experience, your employer brand is yielding returns.