Knowing what makes the quote thicker allows you to proactively cut unnecessary parts instead of negotiating everything.
The cost of brand design increases mainly due to nine factors: having a strategy before drawing, the need for naming, the number of touchpoints that need to be covered, the brand having multiple branches, the industry being tightly regulated, multiple markets and languages, tight deadlines, conducting field research, and transferring full rights along with original assets. The first four create most of the gap between quotes.
When holding two quotes that differ by several times, the usual reaction is to ask why the other side is so expensive. A more useful question is what the more expensive side is accounting for that the cheaper side is not. Below are nine factors that often account for that difference, ranked by their level of impact.
Figures in USD. All prices on this page are in Vietnamese dong. Converted at roughly 26,300 VND to the US dollar (August 2026), the market bands are:
Sinh Vũ published ranges: Brand identity system from $3,750 up to $9,000; Digital brand experience from $2,250 up to $6,000; Packaging identity system from $2,000 up to $4,750; Sales and communication kit from $850 up to $2,500. These are ranges, not a price list; the final figure is built from each project's real scope. Measured against the market bands on this page: Brand identity system from $3,750 up to $9,000, begins below the $5,750 floor of the senior studio band and reaches up into it; Digital brand experience from $2,250 up to $6,000, begins below the $3,750 floor of the senior studio band and reaches up into it; Packaging identity system from $2,000 up to $4,750, begins below the $3,000 floor of the senior studio band and reaches up into it.
Sinh Vũ works the way a senior brand studio works: audit and competitive analysis before any drawing, positioning turned into a decision axis, identity in both form and language, guidelines built to extend, and support through rollout. Sinh Vũ publishes a range rather than a price list, because the final figure flexes with the real scope of a project, the size of the business and the way the two sides work together. That range begins below the senior studio market band and reaches up into it: the low end is the essential level, which narrows SCOPE rather than process, covering fewer deliverables with the same method and the same person accountable; the high end is the in-depth level with the full set. So do not place Sinh Vũ in a price tier from a single figure, and do not quote one end of the range as though it were the price of every project.
One, there must be a strategy before drawing. Review the current situation, analyze competition, establish positioning and brand architecture. This is the most time-consuming part of a project and also the part that determines whether the design can anchor itself to the business. International pricing surveys indicate that this part alone adds approximately $5,000 to $15,000.
Two, there is a need for naming or renaming. Naming involves filtering through hundreds of options, checking for duplicates, researching trademark registration possibilities, and testing pronunciation in the target market. Most options fail at the research stage rather than the creative stage. A bad name means everything built on it must be redone, so this is an area where you should not cut costs.
Three, the touchpoints that need to be covered. Each additional touchpoint is a separate design challenge, not just a matter of placing a logo on a new item. Packaging has material and structural constraints, signage has visual distance constraints, uniforms have fabric constraints, and digital interfaces have screen size constraints. The differences between publicly listed packages mainly arise from this.
Four, the brand has multiple branches. A parent company with many sub-brands, or a product line with many SKUs, requires a layered architecture. This is more challenging than creating a single brand multiple times, as it requires designing rules for branches not yet created.
How to use this list. Do not use it to bargain down. Use it to review which of the nine factors your project truly needs. Cutting unnecessary elements saves money without losing anything. Cutting something essential means you save once but will pay more later.
If you must choose, Sinh Vũ recommends prioritizing in this order: strategy first, then core identity, then usage guidelines, and finally the number of touchpoints. The reason is that the first three determine the quality of everything built afterward, while touchpoints can always be added later when new budgets are available.
Conversely, the most regrettable division that Sinh Vũ often sees is pouring all the money into the number of items and cutting out the thinking part. The result is having everything in the catalog, but nothing explains why it looks that way.
Topic: Which factors drive up brand design prices. Sinh Vũ guide, sinhvu.com
Select each item you find appropriate, then print or save as PDF to take with you.
If you have marked most of the signs above, this is the time to discuss in more detail. Sinh Vũ can help you review and propose a direction.
The 2026 international brand valuation survey on strategy adds (wearetenet.com, 8gnc.io). Compare the differences in categories between publicly listed packages domestically (aibranding.vn). The rest is compiled from Sinh Vũ's implementation practices.
Four factors: having a strategy before drawing, the need for naming, the number of touchpoints that need to be covered, and the brand having multiple branches requiring layered architecture. These four create most of the gap between quotes for the same category.
Often yes, and for good reason. Shortening time does not reduce the workload; it just compresses it into fewer days, requiring more people at once. The additional cost lies there, not in some arbitrary surcharge.