Perspectives · Finance Sector

When the seller is the channel: the insurance brand still works

The agent closes the deal, but the brand decides who is allowed into the living room.

Quick summary

Life insurance sold through agents does not mean the company's brand is meaningless. The brand does not replace the agent, but it determines whether customers are willing to sit and listen and whether they stay after the first year. When the product is intangible and the contract lasts for 20 years, trust in the company behind it is what keeps people.

Life insurance is one of the few industries where customers do not actively seek out products. They do not browse shelves, compare prices on websites, or place orders at midnight. They buy because a friend calls or because a relative recommends an agent. When the sales channel is a person, many think the company's brand becomes secondary. This is a misconception at the most critical point.

The brand does not replace the agent, it opens the door first

The agent knocks on the door. But what decides whether the door opens is the question the customer asks themselves before the meeting: "Have I heard of this company before? Is it reputable?" If the company name evokes a vague feeling or nothing at all, the agent must spend most of the first meeting proving their existence instead of explaining the product's value.

This is the mechanism that Byron Sharp calls mental availability, which is the ability to be remembered when the need arises. With insurance, the "need" does not occur when customers actively want to buy. The need arises when an agent calls, when friends recount family incidents, or when reading news about accidents. In those moments, the company that has already been imprinted in the customer's mind will be trusted first.

38%The higher price that customers are willing to pay for a brand is perceived as "meaningful and different." Source: Kantar BrandZ, around 2020.

An intangible product means the seller is tangible

There is no way to try life insurance beforehand. Customers cannot hold, wear, or test it. They sign a piece of paper and begin paying monthly for a commitment that may or may not happen in the future. This is a transaction that requires the highest level of trust.

In this context, the agent becomes the first tangible proof of the brand. The way the agent dresses, how they present documents, and how they respond when customers ask about exclusion clauses all reflect the company's image. If the company's brand does not have a clear identity system, lacks sales document standards, and does not maintain a consistent language about its values, each agent will build their own version of the brand. As a result, the same company can provide different experiences to each customer.

The brand is the customer's perception, not the logo. Everything the company does shapes that perception.

Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap

In the first year: the agent retains customers. From the second year onward: the brand retains customers

The Vietnamese life insurance market faces a notable cancellation rate after the first year. The Vietnam Insurance Association recognizes this as one of the structural challenges of the industry during the 2022 to 2024 period, following a phase of rapid growth due to bancassurance.

The most common reason is that expectations at the time of purchase do not match the reality of use. The agent commits in one way, the contract is written differently, and the process for resolving benefits occurs in a third way. After the first year, when the personal relationship with the agent fades, the only thing keeping customers is their trust in the company behind it. If the brand cannot build that trust independently and is entirely dependent on the individual agent, the second-year contract is likely to be abandoned.

85% / 30%85% of organizations have brand identity materials, but only about 30% implement them consistently in practice. Source: Marq (Lucidpress), 2021.
Data on the cancellation rate of life insurance contracts in Vietnam is periodically recorded by the Insurance Management and Supervision Department along with the Vietnam Insurance Association, but it is not published as a unified figure. This article uses qualitative insights from industry reports instead of citing a specific rate to avoid confusion in context.

The agent also chooses the company

A commonly overlooked point: insurance agents are not tied to a single company. A good agent can work with multiple companies or move when better conditions arise. When recruiting high-quality agents, the company's brand becomes a competitive factor just like recruiting senior personnel.

A good agent wants to sell the company's products without having to justify them. They want clear documents, consistent messaging, and a company name that is substantial enough that customers do not ask, "Is this company big?" Conversely, if the brand is weak or associated with negative news, the agent has to take on additional work that the company should have done beforehand.

Three things a brand needs to do in this industry

With the unique selling channel being people, life insurance brands need to focus on three specific things.

  • Consistent identity across all materials used by agents: brochures, presentation slides, sample contracts, follow-up emails after meetings. When agents are the main touchpoint, every item they carry is the brand's front.
  • Brand language clearly conveys real value. It is not a technical product description, but an answer to the question customers truly ask: "Why should I trust this company to be around in 20 years?"
  • Public and verifiable evidence: cases of actual benefit settlements, payment rates, processing times. These figures, when presented transparently, do what an agent's words cannot do alone.
50 millisecondsThe time it takes for the brain to form the first visual impression of a brand. Source: Lindgaard et al., Behaviour & Information Technology, 2006.

Brand and agent: aligned, not substitutes for each other

The company's brand and a good agent do not compete with each other. They operate on two different layers. The agent interacts directly, builds personal relationships, and closes deals. The company's brand establishes a foundation of trust before the agent meets the customer and keeps them engaged after the personal relationship fades.

Any company that only invests in training agents while neglecting the brand is leaving agents to fight alone in the first round. Any company that focuses solely on branding without having capable agents will also fail to reach customers. Both need to go hand in hand, and the glue that connects these two layers is consistency: the same language, the same imagery, and the same commitments from advertising to the time customers call the fifteenth year of the contract.

References

Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap. Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow. Kantar BrandZ 2020. Swiss Re Institute, World Insurance Report 2023. Vietnam Insurance Association (IAV), market report 2024.

Frequently asked questions

The agent has already made sales, does the insurance company still need to invest in branding?

Necessary. The company's brand is what the agent presents when customers ask, 'Is this company reputable?' If the answer relies entirely on the agent's word, the company is placing all the credibility risk on one person. A strong brand helps the agent close faster and keeps customers engaged after the first year.

Why do many people cancel their insurance contracts after the first year?

Mostly due to mismatched expectations at the time of purchase and the reality of use. The agent commits in one way, while the process for resolving benefits occurs differently. A consistent brand from advertising to post-sale service helps narrow that gap. When customers trust the company behind it, they have less reason to cancel the contract.

How should an insurance brand communicate when the product is intangible and complex?

Do not try to explain the product. Instead, communicate the perceived outcomes: peace of mind, family protection, responsible action. A consistent identity image and real evidence, such as actual benefit resolution cases, will be more convincing than any product comparison chart.

← Back to Perspectives