The question is not 'should we tell a regional story' but 'to what extent does the brand confine itself'.
Regional origin is an asset when it creates real and unreplicable differentiation. It becomes a barrier when the brand wants to expand products, markets, or price segments where the original geographical name is no longer appropriate. The solution is not to abandon the origin but to build the right brand architecture from the start so that the origin becomes one layer, not the entirety.
About 80% of Vietnamese agricultural products are exported in raw form, without branding, according to data from the WTO Center and Integration. This means that most of the value is left at the border. When hearing that number, many business owners' first reaction is: 'So I have to tell the regional story.' Correct. But how that story is told, where it is placed in the brand architecture, and when it starts to backfire is a problem that few are willing to stop and address thoroughly.
Regional origin does what most marketing tools cannot: it creates irrefutable evidence. Buon Ma Thuot coffee has a unique flavor because that basalt plateau does not exist in Dong Nai. ST25 rice has a distinct aroma because the rice variety is grown in the brackish water of Soc Trang. This is the differentiation that Byron Sharp calls 'distinctiveness': not 'better' by abstract criteria, but 'only found here'.
Urban customers, especially the rapidly expanding middle class in Vietnam, are willing to pay more for products with a clear origin story. Kantar BrandZ notes that brands perceived by customers as 'meaningful and distinctive' can command prices up to 38% higher than competitors in the same segment. In the agricultural sector, origin is the quickest mechanism to achieve both criteria simultaneously.
A brand is not a logo. A brand is the perception in the customer's gut about a product, service, or company.
Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap
The issue does not arise at the beginning. It appears when the business starts to grow.
Imagine a honey brand named after the province where the first flower garden is located. Initially, that name serves as proof of quality. Three years later, the business wants to source more from two other provinces to ensure supply for the supermarket channel. The origin story begins to waver. The following year, they want to launch a line of processed honey products, no longer tied to the original geographical name. At this point, the brand name no longer encompasses everything.
This is the most common trap in the Vietnamese agricultural sector: using a geographical name as the main brand name, instead of using it as a layer of the story. When the origin is the name, every step of expansion must go against the initial promise. A brand cannot grow without betraying itself.
The case of ST25 rice is a lesson in the opposite direction: the product does not use a geographical name as the main name, but did not register trademark protection in export markets. As a result, a company in the US registered the name ST25 first, leading to a prolonged dispute. Origin and trademark are two different protection mechanisms that need to run in parallel.
Sinh Vũ often uses these four questions to check before deciding the level of connection between the brand and geographical origin.
The solution is not to abandon the origin story. The solution is to place the origin in the right position within the brand architecture.
Café de Colombia is a frequently cited example in the industry: 'Colombia' is not the brand name, but a quality certification behind hundreds of individual coffee brands. Each brand builds its own image, while 'Made with 100% Colombian Coffee' serves as a guarantee. These two layers operate independently and support each other.
In the reality of small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam, a simpler structure can still be applied: the parent brand name does not contain a geographical name, but the brand story, packaging, and communication channels clearly convey the origin as proof of quality commitment. The geographical name is content, not an identifier. When needing to expand the source of materials or launch a new line, the parent brand name retains its accumulated value.
Kapferer describes six facets of brand identity, where 'physique' (physical characteristics) is the first but not the only facet. Origin belongs to the physique layer, the most visible layer. But a strong brand has all six layers: personality, culture, relationship, reflection, and self-image of customers. When only physique exists, any geographical or raw material fluctuations can undermine the entire brand.
You can recognize a brand being trapped by its geographical name through several specific signs. The sales team has to explain at length when opening distribution channels in new markets, as the geographical name causes confusion or lacks persuasion. When launching new products, the marketing team has to 'break' the origin story instead of inheriting it. Investors or partners question the sustainability of the raw materials as soon as they see the brand name. These signs do not appear all at once, but when they start to repeat, it is a signal to reconsider the brand architecture, not to change the logo.
Origin is one of the strongest assets that Vietnamese agricultural products have, but it has not been exploited correctly. The question is not whether to use it or not. The question is: where to place it in the system so that it serves growth instead of hindering it.
Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow, Ehrenberg-Bass Institute. Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap. Kapferer, The New Strategic Brand Management. Trungtamwto.vn: ~80% of agricultural products exported without branding. Intellectual Property Office, list of protected geographical indications. Kantar BrandZ, report on meaningful and distinctive brands, ~2020. VnExpress, Thanh Niên: the case of ST24/ST25 rice being trademarked in the US and Australia.
No. Geographical indications are a legal protection tool for a collective of businesses in the same region, not the private property of a single brand. ST25 rice has GI in Vietnam but is still subject to trademark registration with the same name in the US because these two mechanisms operate independently. Brands need a separate trademark registration strategy in each market, alongside leveraging the origin story.
Absolutely yes, but it is important to clearly distinguish the two layers: the origin story is proof of quality, while the brand name is the private property of the business. Do not use the geographical name as the main brand name if you plan to expand beyond that region. Let the geographical name play a role as an 'implicit certification' within the story, not the entire identifier.
When you start wanting to source materials from multiple regions to ensure supply, or want to launch a new product line not tied to the original geographical name, continuing to use the geographical name as the main name will create contradictions in the eyes of customers and limit growth potential. A common approach is to move the origin to the sub-brand or specific product line, while the parent brand name maintains geographical neutrality.