Perspectives · Agriculture

One packaging for two markets: the double failure formula.

When the cooperative uses a common design for domestic and export goods, they save nothing. They are losing both markets.

Quick summary

Export agricultural products need packaging, brand language, and signal systems that are completely different from the domestic market. Foreign buyers do not share the same cultural context, reading habits, and trust criteria as domestic consumers. Using the same design does not save costs; it loses both markets at the same time.

Many Vietnamese agricultural cooperatives make a decision for budget reasons. But the consequences are much greater than the seemingly saved amount. This means using the same packaging and brand language for both domestic and export markets. The result: products in domestic supermarkets cannot compete because they look "exported, unfamiliar." Products going abroad do not sell because they appear "local, not understood." This is a failure in both markets at the same time.

Why do foreign buyers read packaging so differently?

Domestic consumers recognize agricultural products through a familiar set of signals: the name of the province, local imagery, and approachable Vietnamese text. Sometimes, a handwritten label is enough to create a sense of "genuine, fresh goods." This context has been formed over many years. Buyers fill in the gaps with their existing knowledge.

Buyers in export markets, whether B2B importers or end consumers in European or Japanese supermarkets, do not have that context. They do not know that Đắk Lắk is the coffee capital. They do not understand what "highland specialties" mean. They cannot read Quốc ngữ. What they can read are: certifications, images of processes, and stories of origin translated and presented according to the standards they are familiar with.

This is not a translation issue. It is an information architecture issue on the packaging. The domestic market reads packaging emotionally first, then rationally. The B2B export market reads in the opposite direction: certifications, traceability, ingredients, processes, and then the story.

~80%Vietnamese agricultural products exported lack branding, sold as raw goods or labeled with foreign importers' brands. Source: WTO and Integration Center, trungtamwto.vn.

Domestic and export packaging: two different challenges

Domestic packaging needs to answer the question: "Can I trust this product?" Vietnamese buyers trust through familiarity: names of regions they have heard, images that evoke memories of markets or hometowns. Designs that serve this purpose need to be relatable, warm, and have local character.

Export packaging needs to answer a different question: "What standards does this product meet, where does it come from, and why should I trust it?" Foreign buyers do not have the cultural memory to fill in the blanks. They need to see clear information in the format they are accustomed to reading. This includes prominent certifications (GlobalG.A.P., organic EU, or certifications suitable for the target market), a story of origin presented through universal visual language, and text in English or the local market language with a professional tone.

There are also technical requirements. The EU market requires nutritional information in a specific format. Japan requires ingredients to be listed in a certain order. The U.S. has regulations on minimum font size on food labels. A single design cannot simultaneously comply with these regulations and still look natural to domestic buyers.

38%the higher price that consumers are willing to pay for a brand perceived as "meaningful and different." Source: Kantar BrandZ, around 2020.

The story of origin: the greatest asset is currently wasted

The paradox of Vietnamese agricultural products is that the story of origin is very strong, yet it is one of the least told. Buôn Ma Thuột coffee has a nearly century-long cultivation history. ST25 rice has won the title of the world's best rice twice. Phú Quốc pepper has a geographical indication protected in the EU since 2016. These are stories that the high-end export market is willing to pay to hear.

But "storytelling" here does not mean writing a long paragraph on the box. It is a system of visual and linguistic signals designed so that first-time viewers, even without any knowledge of Vietnam, can still perceive three things: this product comes from a specific place, is grown using a specific method, and has a value that justifies the asking price. Parmigiano Reggiano achieves this. Café de Colombia achieves this. Both build a signal system strong enough for the story to speak for itself, without needing much explanation.

A brand is not just a logo. A brand is the feeling in the buyer's gut about your product.

Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap

Vietnamese agricultural cooperatives often skip this step because they think that "certification is enough." Certification is a necessary condition to enter the market, not a sufficient condition to sell products. Foreign buyers have hundreds of options that are already certified. The story and brand signal system are what make them choose you over others.

ST25 case: losing brand because of not owning the language

In 2021, ST25 rice from engineer Hồ Quang Cua was trademarked by several American companies before entering the U.S. market. The name "ST25" and the title "the world's best rice" are widely known domestically. However, in the U.S. market, no Vietnamese organization legally owns those terms.

This is a typical consequence of the "one brand for all" mindset: focusing on building identity domestically, without a separate brand language strategy for foreign markets. Export brand language is not just about translating the product name into English. It also involves deciding which names, writing styles, and symbol systems will be registered for protection in each target market before the products enter that market.

126 productsachieving 5-star OCOP status in Vietnam by 2025, but most lack branding strategies and intellectual property protection to access export markets. Source: Central Coordination Office for New Rural Development.

Two-tier brand architecture: shared core, distinct expressions

The solution is a two-tier architecture: a shared core and a market-specific expression.

The core shared elements consist of three things: origin value (growing region, methods, history), quality standards (certifications, control processes), and the story of the people behind the product. These elements do not change regardless of where the goods are sold.

The market-specific expression part has four components. Display language: Vietnamese for domestic, English or the target market language for export. Information layout on packaging: emotional appeal for domestic, emphasis on certifications and specifications for export. Color and imagery system: close and warm for domestic, professional and universal for export. And particularly, the legal language system registered for protection in each market.

This is not a large budget problem. It is a mindset problem: understanding that the two markets have two buyers with two different reference systems, and designing each item for the right audience.

Transparent note: The figures regarding OCOP and the percentage of unbranded agricultural exports in this article come from reports and statistics from the Vietnamese government. Kantar BrandZ's data on the willingness to pay 38% more is the result of a global consumer survey, not a direct measure for the Vietnamese agricultural sector. Sinh Vũ cites this data as a trend signal, not as a forecast of specific results for each business.

References

WTO Center and Integration (trungtamwto.vn): ~90% of agricultural exports are in raw form, ~80% are unbranded. Brandsvietnam: analysis of agricultural packaging. VnExpress, Thanh Niên: the ST25 case and geographical indications. Parmigiano Reggiano Consortium: GI model + storytelling. Kantar BrandZ: customers pay 38% more for "meaningful + different" brands (~2020). Business Forum: intellectual property of Vietnamese agricultural products.

Frequently asked questions

Why can't we use the same packaging for both domestic and export markets?

Domestic consumers identify products through familiar contexts: Vietnamese text, regional names, relatable images. Foreign buyers do not have that context; they need different signals to build trust, from language, international certifications, to how the story of origin is told. A design that serves both means it does not serve either well.

Does a small cooperative have enough resources to build two brand systems?

It is not necessary to build two completely separate systems. Core elements such as origin value, regional stories, and quality certifications can be shared. What needs to be separate are the display language, packaging layout, information presentation, and reliable signal systems tailored to each market. This is a brand architecture problem, not a budget problem.

Does OCOP help with exports?

OCOP is a domestic quality certification. It holds value for Vietnamese consumers but is virtually meaningless for foreign buyers. For export, agricultural products need international certifications suitable for the target market, such as GlobalG.A.P., organic EU, or USDA Organic. Accompanying this is the story of origin presented according to the standards of that market.

← Back to Perspectives