Competitors having videos is not a reason for you to make one. A strong reason is a clear business goal.
Video is only worth investing in when tied to a specific business goal: launching a product, explaining complex features, building long-term awareness, or driving a clear action. Making a video just because competitors have it is a weak reason and can easily waste money on something no one remembers. Before discussing format and production methods, confirm whether the video serves to build the brand or activate sales.
Video is one of the most time, labor, and money-intensive formats in the brand toolkit. Therefore, the question "Is it worth doing?" needs a clear answer before discussing anything else about format, length, or production methods. This question should be addressed right from the beginning of the brief: what behavior or perception is this video intended to change in customers?
Before deciding to make a video, you need to determine where that video stands in the business journey. According to research by Les Binet and Peter Field (IPA), communication activities clearly divide into two roles with entirely different operating mechanisms.
Building a brand (long-term): Creates slow effects, accumulating over time. Measured by brand awareness, associations, and prioritization. Effectiveness is often only evident after many months.
Short-term sales activation: Create a quick boost, immediate response. Measured by clicks, sign-ups, direct revenue. The effect fades quickly when the campaign stops.
Choosing the wrong role leads to incorrect metrics and misplaced expectations. A beautifully branded video evaluated by next week's sales will always be deemed a 'failure' even if the video is doing its job.
Google's ABCD framework outlines four things that every advertising video needs to clarify: attract attention (Attract), present the brand early (Brand), create a connection (Connect), and direct action (Direct). If you have not identified the desired action after viewing, the video should not be shot yet. These four points can be translated into four practical questions:
The final question is often the most overlooked. If the goal is merely to announce a short-term offer to an audience already familiar with the brand, there are less costly ways than producing a full video.
Not every stage requires a video. Below are situations where video is truly worth investing in, and situations where you should pause and think further.
Most brand videos fail not because of poor technique but because of unclear goals from the start. Nielsen also notes that the quality of the creative idea is one of the significant factors affecting advertising effectiveness: a beautiful video without a clear goal cannot be saved by technique.
Each image must serve a specific purpose. If you cannot articulate what that purpose is, do not press the shutter.
Practical experience.
Video should be viewed as a touchpoint within the overall brand system, serving a purpose in a long-term strategy, not as a standalone production. If the answer to "what is the real problem behind the video" is simply "because competitors have it," that is a weak reason and there are often more effective ways to use the budget. If the goal is just to announce a simple offer, there are usually lighter alternatives than a fully produced video.
A video is worth making when it is the best answer to a real problem, not when it is the only answer you think of.
Topic: Which business problems video should solve, or just because competitors have it. Sinh Vũ guide, sinhvu.com
Tick each item that applies or that you can already answer, then print or save as PDF to take with you.
If you have marked most of the signs above, this is the time to discuss in more detail. Sinh Vũ can help you review and propose a direction.
Think with Google, ABCD framework for effective video advertising; IPA, Les Binet and Peter Field, The Long and the Short of It; Nielsen, factors driving advertising ROI.
You should not hit record just for that reason. Competitors may be burning their budget on something ineffective, or they may have entirely different goals than you. The question that needs to be answered first is: what problem does that video solve for your business? If you do not have an answer yet, waiting is not a weakness but a budget discipline.
Not necessarily. Stuffing every message into one video out of fear of waste is a common mistake. The result often leads to no clear takeaway. Each video should serve a specific purpose and desired action. Multiple short videos, targeting the right audience at the right stage, are often more effective than one long video trying to cover everything.
Ask yourself: how long do you want the results to take and how will you measure them? Brand-building videos create slow but lasting effects, measured by awareness and associations. Sales activation videos create quick but short-lived boosts, measured by clicks, sign-ups, or direct revenue. Choosing the wrong role leads to measuring the wrong metrics and expecting incorrect results.
This article is for reference. The scope, pricing, and specific commitments of Sinh Vũ are detailed in the proposal and signed contract.