A true SLA is not just a promise of 'quick response.' It must include delivery deadlines, number of revisions, and handling procedures for missed deadlines, tied to each urgency level of the task.
The SLA in a long-term package must be tiered according to the urgency of each type of work, rather than applying a common level for everything. Each tier needs three components: delivery deadline (number of days from approval of the brief to results), number of revisions allowed, and how to handle if deadlines are missed. An SLA without consequences for violations is merely a promise labeled as SLA.
Questions about SLA (service level agreement, which sets timeframes and conditions for each type of work) often arise when you have signed a long-term package. At that point, you start wanting to know: how long it takes to get results after submitting a task, how urgent requests are prioritized, and who is responsible if there are delays. This is a question that should be asked right from the start of the contract, not after several instances of waiting too long.
Many parties write in contracts "feedback within 24 hours" and call that an SLA. That is not enough. A valuable service commitment needs to include three parts:
An SLA without a third party cannot bind anything. Both parties can still argue as before after signing.
The creative service commitment is an agreement that includes specific delivery deadlines, the number of revision rounds, and the process for handling unsatisfactory outcomes. Lacking any part means the rest is merely a one-sided expectation.
Sakas & Company, Agency Service Level Agreements; Lolopepe, SLA in Creative Services
Not all tasks have the same level of priority. Applying a common SLA level for both regular publications and communication crises is incorrect for both sides. Tasks are often overestimated, while urgent tasks do not receive enough priority. A common division is into three tiers:
Borrowing the tiered approach from incident management: the higher the level, the faster and more continuous the response; the lower level follows the regular schedule and is flexible. Applying this principle to creative services helps both parties agree on priorities without debating each case.
The higher the urgency level, the faster and more continuously the clock runs. The low level measures during business hours and can be extended when the sprint is full.
Atlassian, Incident Severity Levels; Rootly, Incident Support Levels P1-P3.
Acknowledgement: confirm receipt of the task, state the expected delivery date. Measured in working hours. The purpose is to prevent the state of "not knowing where the work stands."
Delivery: the first draft is delivered for approval. Measured in working days from the moment the brief is approved, not from when you send a request. Both parties need to agree on what "approved" means, as you cannot start counting when the brief is still lacking information.
Confusing these two milestones is the source of most conflicts regarding SLA. Clients think the clock starts running from the moment they send a message, while the provider counts from when they have enough information to proceed.
The contracted hours always have a cap, so the SLA is valuable when it helps set the right priorities, not when it promises unlimited handling. You should demand from the beginning the number of revisions and deadlines for each task, so both parties can measure and compare instead of relying on subjective feelings of "fast" or "slow."
Topic: Service level agreement (SLA) and response times in long-term packages. Sinh Vũ guide, sinhvu.com
Tick each item that applies or that you can already answer, then print or save as PDF to take with you.
If you have marked most of the signs above, this is the time to discuss in more detail. Sinh Vũ can help you review and propose a direction.
Sakas & Company, Agency Service Level Agreements; Lolopepe, SLA in Creative Services; Atlassian, Incident Severity Levels; Rootly, Incident Support Levels P1-P3. Practical experience from Sinh Vũ Studio.
No. Feedback is a confirmation of receipt and states the deadline for results. The actual deadline is calculated in working days, depending on the complexity and urgency of the task. These two milestones need to be clearly specified to avoid confusion.
The SLA must specify consequences: priority handling in the next sprint, or adjustments to the number of revisions, or other compensatory measures that both parties have agreed upon from the start. An SLA without this clause cannot bind anything in substance.
You should not. With a retainer running in sprints, SLA should be measured per sprint rather than aggregated over the month. Aggregating the month can lead to end-of-term backlogs not being accurately assessed and can easily cause disputes over which tasks qualify for SLA.
This article is for reference. The scope, pricing, and specific commitments of Sinh Vũ are detailed in the proposal and signed contract.