Perspective · Logistics industry

When logistics clients only ask for price: turning reliability into a signal

Price is not the only weapon, and often not the best one.

Quick summary

When customers only ask for prices, it is not because they lack money. It is because they lack reasons to trust. In the logistics industry, the commodity trap does not come from the market but from how companies present themselves: everyone claims "fast, safe, reliable," but no one proves it in a way that buyers can see before signing a contract.

Why logistics easily falls into the price trap

Logistics is an industry that sells promises about the future. Customers sign contracts today to receive results in three days, three weeks, or three months. They cannot "try before they buy" like purchasing a shirt. Therefore, when there are no other signals to rely on, they use price as a shortcut to make decisions.

Here’s the crux: the question about price often serves as a substitute for the real question, which is "can I trust this company?" When the brand fails to answer the real question, customers resort to using price to fill that gap. And when all competitors in the industry leave that gap unaddressed, the entire sector becomes a race to the bottom.

16 to 17% of GDPLogistics costs in Vietnam compared to the global average are about 8 to 10%, indicating that the system is under significant strain and the pressure to optimize costs is real. Source: Tuổi Trẻ Newspaper, citing data from the Vietnam Logistics Business Association.

High costs across the industry create real pressure on business customers. This does not mean the only solution is to lower rates. It means that whoever communicates clearer value will maintain profit margins while competitors are busy cutting prices.

Reliability does not speak for itself

Almost every logistics website in Vietnam has a "Why choose us" section with three columns: fast, safe, professional. Those three columns do not build trust. They create ambiguity, because when everyone says the same thing, the reader's brain retains nothing.

According to Byron Sharp's principles in How Brands Grow, brand recognition does not come from claiming to be different. It comes from distinctive signals, meaning things that are repeated enough to anchor in the buyer's memory at the right moment when they need to hire a service. In logistics, the strongest distinctive signal is not a slogan. It is operational evidence presented in a visible manner.

A brand is not a logo. A brand is a person's gut feeling about a product, service, or organization.

Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap

The "gut feeling" of a B2B client when choosing a logistics partner is formed from dozens of small signals: is the website updated, does the fleet look well-maintained, how long does it take for staff to respond to emails, is the quote document clear? Each signal is a vote for or against the question "can I trust them?"

Three types of trust signals that can be built

There are three layers of signals that a logistics company can proactively design, regardless of whether they have a large budget or not.

The first layer is publicly available operational signals. On-time delivery rates, the number of lost orders during the period, response times to incidents. These are figures that many companies have but do not disclose because they do not think customers need to see them. In fact, that is what customers need to see the most. Viettel Post is a domestic example when they announced a target of zero losses by 2025, turning internal KPIs into public commitments.

The second layer is the identification signals that cover physical touchpoints. Fleet, uniforms, warehouses, post offices. A clean truck, a clear logo, and neatly uniformed staff are a mobile billboard that incurs no additional advertising costs. Conversely, a faded truck and staff dressed casually send a negative signal about the level of operational control.

The third layer is expertise signals shared externally. Analyses of transport corridors, specific customer case studies, cost optimization guides for each type of goods. When a logistics company shares genuinely useful knowledge, they are demonstrating capability without needing to self-declare. This is how thought leadership operates in the B2B sector.

38%Customers are willing to pay a premium for brands perceived as "meaningful and distinct." Source: Kantar BrandZ, circa 2020.

Specializing in a niche is better than trying to do it all

One of the most common reasons logistics companies get stuck in a price war is overly broad positioning. "Nationwide shipping, all types of goods, all routes" is a statement that says nothing. It does not give customers a specific reason to choose you over someone else.

Niche positioning does not mean rejecting customers outside that niche. It means that when a customer needs to transport temperature-sensitive pharmaceuticals, or high-speed e-commerce fulfillment, or a dedicated North-South route, your name is the first that comes to their mind. This is mental availability in Byron Sharp's terms: there is no need to persuade if you have occupied a place in memory at the right moment of purchase.

Specialization has another practical benefit: it allows you to price based on value rather than cost. A company specializing in temperature-controlled shipping for the pharmaceutical industry does not compete with a grocery delivery service. They are operating in a different arena, with different customers, and at a completely different price point.

85% yes, 30% implementation85% of organizations have brand guidelines, but only about 30% implement them consistently in practice. This is the gap between "having a brand" and "operationalizing the brand." Source: Marq / Demand Metric Brand Consistency Report, 2019.

Digital gap: an outdated website is a negative signal

In the B2B sector, the decision to request a quote often starts from the website. A slow website, designed in 2015, lacking case studies, team information, and prominently displayed phone numbers is a series of consecutive negative signals. Business customers do not wait for a call to begin their evaluation. They assess from the first visit.

Stanford Web Credibility research shows that 75% of users assess the reliability of an organization based on the quality of its web design. In B2B logistics, this figure has direct consequences: a shipper considering contracts worth hundreds of millions of VND per month will read the website as they would a capability profile. If that profile looks unprofessional, the next call will only be to ask for prices, as they have decided not to sign if the price is not significantly cheaper.

Transparency note: The figure of 75% from the Stanford Web Credibility research (2002-2004) is based on self-reported surveys conducted over two decades ago. User behavior and design standards have changed significantly. This figure should be read as a trend indicator, not an exact constant for the current context.

Consistency is the mechanism for building trust

Trust is not built in an advertising campaign. It accumulates through multiple touchpoints, each time a little, when the brand looks and behaves consistently across each touchpoint. A uniform fleet. Consistent uniforms. Documents with the same visual language. Emails with the same tone. Each time consistency occurs, the recipient's brain adds another positive signal to the record "this is a trustworthy company."

According to research by Marq and Demand Metric, brand consistency correlates with revenue growth in business surveys, although the accuracy may vary by industry context. More important than the numbers is the mechanism: consistency creates mental availability, meaning the ability to be remembered at the moment a buyer needs to hire a service. And in logistics, "the right moment" can be when an urgent shipment needs a reliable unit without time for further research.

A practical question for any logistics company: if a customer interacts with your brand through five different touchpoints, a truck on the road, a quote email, the website, delivery staff, and a LinkedIn account, do they recognize this as the same company? If the answer is "maybe not," that is where trust is leaking.

References

McKinsey, The Business Value of Design (2018). Kantar BrandZ (circa 2020). ScienceDirect, brand equity B2B logistics. Marq / Demand Metric Brand Consistency Report (2019). Viettel Post rebranding announcement (2023). Tuổi Trẻ newspaper, logistics costs in Vietnam. VnExpress, market share of express delivery 2024-2025. Byron Sharp, How Brands Grow. Marty Neumeier, The Brand Gap.

Frequently asked questions

How can you prove reliability to logistics clients before they sign a contract?

Three types of trust signals can be established before signing a contract: evidence from current customers in the form of case studies or specific reviews, observable operational information such as fleet size, operational scope, order tracking systems, and the professionalism of the first touchpoint including the website, capability profile, and how the consulting staff responds to questions. Logistics customers evaluate suppliers based on the overall signals, not just the price list.

Is focusing on a niche really better than accepting all types of goods?

From a branding perspective, yes, because specializing in a niche allows you to build more specific and convincing trust signals. A logistics company that claims to specialize in temperature-sensitive food can present certifications, processes, and case studies more clearly than a company that accepts all types of goods. In the eyes of customers, niche expertise is often implicitly understood as higher quality for that type of goods.

Does an outdated website affect the ability to win logistics contracts?

Yes, because in the B2B sector, which involves transactions between businesses, the website is the digital capability profile that customers view before meeting in person. An outdated website, lacking information, or not loading on mobile sends negative signals about the operational capacity of the entire company, even if the actual operations are very good. This is not a fair judgment, but a practical reasoning mechanism that all B2B buyers employ.

← Back to Perspective