Using AI does not mean customer data must follow.
Not sharing confidential data or personal information of clients with public AI tools is a minimum safety practice, not an option. When it is necessary to use AI with sensitive data, choose tools with clear data processing agreements. Only input what is truly necessary and has had identifying information obscured. Any decision involving personal data should be approved by someone beforehand. The Personal Data Protection Law 91/2025 and Decree 356/2025 are the legal bases to refer to. Using AI tools hosted overseas may mean transferring personal data abroad, which entails the obligation to conduct impact assessments under the Personal Data Protection Law.
Working with clients involves handling sensitive data right from the brief stage: names, contact phone numbers, contracts, unpublished strategies. When AI begins to participate in the workflow, an important question is which data is input into AI and which is not. The answer to that question determines your credibility with clients, as much as the quality of the product.
Not every piece of data requires the same level of protection. It is necessary to clearly distinguish four layers:
The most common mistake is treating all data as a single block, then making decisions based on convenience rather than risk levels.
Before using any tool, three things need to be checked. Does this tool have a DPA, can the input data be used for training, and who has access to that data?
Data minimization means only inputting into AI what is necessary for a specific task, not providing the entire record "just in case." This principle is part of international data protection standards and is also a principle of the Personal Data Protection Law 2025 (data should only be processed within necessary scope and purpose), and there is a clear practical reason: data that is not input cannot be leaked.
Don't process personal data just because it might be useful later. Each processing needs a legal basis.
ICO, Data minimisation (AI and data protection toolkit)
Data discipline is a condition of credibility, not an additional burden. Customers trust you with sensitive information because they believe in how you operate, not because they are sure you won't be careless.
A streamlined practice: confidential data and personal information of clients should not go into public AI tools. When AI support is needed, prioritize environments that commit to data protection and only input the minimum necessary, which has been obscured. Any decision involving personal data should have someone approve it. When it exceeds limits, refer to security or legal experts instead of handling it yourself.
You don’t need to be a technical expert to practice this. Just have a clear internal policy: which data is allowed into which AI, who is allowed to use it, and when in doubt, ask before proceeding.
Topic: Protecting customer data when using AI. Sinh Vũ guide, sinhvu.com
Tick each item that applies or that you can already answer, then print or save as PDF to take with you.
If you have marked most of the signs above, this is the time to discuss in more detail. Sinh Vũ can help you review and propose a direction.
This article provides general information according to the documents in effect as of October 6, 2026. This is not legal advice and does not substitute for a lawyer's opinion for your specific case. Rights and obligations between Sinh Vũ and clients arise only according to the signed contract.
How Sinh Vũ handles your data: see Privacy policy.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), privacy-enhanced section. ICO: Data minimization in AI and data protection toolkit. ICO: How do we ensure lawfulness in AI? Credal: Acceptable Use Policies for Generative AI. Practical experience from Sinh Vũ Studio.
There are real risks. Free public versions often do not have separate data processing agreements with organizational users. Data may be stored and used to improve models. If personal information analysis is needed, you should use the enterprise version with data protection commitments. Only input the obscured parts, such as names, phone numbers, and addresses.
Anonymization reduces risk but is not absolute. Many pieces of data combined, even if each piece has had names removed, can still identify individuals. The correct practice is to combine anonymization with minimization: only input the fields of data that are truly necessary for that specific task, not the entire record.
You should consult experts when the volume of personal data is large, when data crosses national borders, or when it belongs to tightly regulated sectors like finance or healthcare. You should also consult experts when AI is used to make decisions that directly affect individuals. These cases require legal or security expert opinions; guidelines cannot replace that.
This article is for reference. The scope, pricing, and specific commitments of Sinh Vũ are detailed in the proposal and signed contract.